Research
How do populations persist and adapt when energy is scarce and the environment is hard to predict?
Much of microbial life is short of energy most of the time, in environments that change in ways that are hard to anticipate. I study how populations and communities persist and adapt under these conditions, with experiments in bacteria, phages, protists and the insect Galleria mellonella, genome sequencing, time-series analysis and theory.
Energy: what it costs to persist
When energy runs short, genetically identical cells do not all respond in the same way. Some keep growing, some form dormant spores, and some become persisters that survive antibiotics without being resistant. These states let a population survive stress, but they are not free.
With Jay Lennon, I measured the energetic cost of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis in units of ATP. Making and reviving a spore takes almost 1010 ATP, about 10% of a cell’s total energy budget, so sporulation is favorable only when stress is long or unpredictable. When sporulation is not needed, its cost is large enough that selection can favor deleting sporulation genes rather than merely letting them decay. Related work follows B. subtilis populations through 1,000 days without added resources.
Next, I want to know what drives cells into each state and what that means for evolution. Dormant cells are not exposed to selection, so a large dormant fraction should slow adaptation.
Paper: PNAS 2026 · Code: cost_of_spore · starvation
Predictability: forecasting infection
Infections can end very differently in hosts that look alike at the start. In the Brown Lab I ask which measurements predict the outcome, and why some outcomes are hard to predict at all.
Across diverse host–pathogen systems, we found that the risk of death keeps rising over the course of an acute infection instead of staying constant, as standard epidemiological models assume. In the insect Galleria mellonella infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the host’s condition links infection history to survival: once host damage is accounted for, pathogen density adds little to predicting which hosts survive. In game-theory models of coevolution, hosts and pathogens that evolve conditional response rules, rather than fixed traits, accumulate cryptic genetic variation that is expressed abruptly once a threshold is crossed, and their responses to one another alone can make the dynamics hard to predict.
Next, I will manipulate host nutrition in Galleria to test whether energy limitation constrains how hosts respond to infection. Outside infection experiments, I ran the time-series analysis for a colleague’s wastewater surveillance study, testing whether virus loads in sewage lead reported cases.
Papers: mSphere 2025 · Proceedings B (under review) · Code: metaAnalysis · Galleria_Survival · GoldsteinGameTheory · wasteWaterVirus
Noise: fluctuating environments and noisy data
Environments with the same average conditions can differ in how predictable their fluctuations are. Theory predicts that this alone changes what evolves: predictable change should favor genetic adaptation, and unpredictable change flexible strategies such as bet-hedging. The prediction is rarely tested with the mean and variance held fixed.
In ongoing experiments, Escherichia coli evolves with its phages and competitors under antibiotic regimes that differ only in how they fluctuate over time, and I measure how growth, resistance and phage susceptibility change. In a pilot I designed at UFZ with two students, the strain evolved its highest resistance only without competitors, and the competitor it faced shaped which traits evolved.
Noise is also a property of data. As PI of a Cystic Fibrosis Foundation fellowship, I analyze longitudinal records of routine antibiotic-susceptibility tests of P. aeruginosa from people with cystic fibrosis, treating each test as a noisy sample of the resistance in the patient. Bayesian mixed models, Markov models of transitions between resistance states and empirical dynamic modeling indicate that resistance follows nonlinear, state-dependent dynamics.
Across projects, I use empirical dynamic modeling to measure predictability and infer causal links from time series, and state-space models to separate real fluctuations from measurement error (Ecosphere 2022).
Code: noise-host-phage · longitudinal_AST
Community dynamics and stability
My PhD at UFZ and iDiv asked how predator–prey interactions shape communities under disturbance, using microcosms of bacterial prey and the protist predator Tetrahymena. I examined how the system recovers from press and pulse disturbances and how predation and disturbance together shape prey communities, and showed that interaction strengths shift over time in ways that alter which species coexist.
Since then, with colleagues, I have helped develop ways to measure stability in systems without static equilibria and a practical guide to characterizing coexistence, and tested how temperature and biodiversity relate to the stability of natural aquatic food webs. I have also worked in more natural settings: freshwater microbial communities under nutrient enrichment, a field experiment on climate extremes in grassland and heath, and greenhouse experiments in which drought changed how mycorrhizal fungal diversity and barley genotype diversity interact.
These projects share a question I now ask across levels of organization: when the parts of a system respond differently to change, does that response diversity keep the whole stable?
Papers: BMC Ecology 2017 · Scientific Reports 2018 · Scientific Reports 2019 · Ecology Letters 2020 · Ecology Letters 2021 · Ecosphere 2022 · Nature Communications 2023 · Biological Reviews 2026







